نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مدیریت و فلسفه علم وفناوری، دانشگاه علم و صنعت، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: در خروج کارآفرین به‌عنوان یک تصمیم مهم در طول فرآیند کارآفرینی است. خروج بخشی از فرآیند کارآفرینی است و تأثیر زیادی بر اکوسیستم کسب‌وکار و اقتصاد می‌گذارد. بررسی فرآیند کارآفرینی بدون بررسی پدیده خروج ناقص است. در این پژوهش قصد داریم با تحلیل خروج کارآفرینی در طول مراحل شش‌گانه چرخه رشد کسب‌وکار به شناخت دقیق‌تری از این پدیده دست‌یابیم. اولویت‌بندی دلایل خروج بین کارآفرین تجاری و اجتماعی به شناخت دقیق‌تر از این حوزه کمک می‌کند. در این تحقیق برای رتبه‌بندی دلایل خروج از روش اندازه‌های تکراری استفاده نمودیم.
روش‌شناسی پژوهش: جامعه آماری تحقیق عبارت است از خبرگان و کارآفرینان که به روش گلوله برفی و نمونه­‌گیری در دسترس به‌صورت آگاهانه انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: پس از بررسی نظرات خبرگان و کارآفرینان مشخص شد که اهمیت دلایل خروج ازنظر هر دو نوع کارآفرین تجاری و اجتماعی در طول مراحل مختلف رشد کسب‌وکار تغییر می‌کند. از سوی دیگر دلایل خروج ازنظر شخص کارآفرین و ازنظر شرکت الزاماً از یکدیگر تبعیت نمی‌کنند به‌نحوی‌که اهمیت دلایل خروج از منظر شخص کارآفرین تجاری و اجتماعی متفاوت است، ولی از منظر شرکت تجاری و اجتماعی مشابه می‌باشد. این نتایج نشان‌دهنده این است که دلایل خروج در مراحل مختلف متفاوت بوده و نمی‌توان فهرستی از دلایل خروج برای همه کسب‌وکارها بدون توجه به مرحله رشد آن‌ها ارائه داد.
اصالت/ارزش‌افزوده علمی: این پژوهش با استفاده از روش سنجش اندازه‌های تکراری به دنبال رتبه‌بندی دلایل خروج کارآفرینان ایرانی (در سطح تجاری و اجتماعی) در طول مراحل مختلف رشد کسب‌وکار پرداخته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prioritizing the Entrepreneurial Exit Causes at Business Growth Stages

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammadreza Parsanejad
  • Seyyed Rashid Shahcheragh

Department of Management and Philosophy of Science and Technology, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: The entrepreneur's exit is an important decision during the entrepreneurial process. The exit is part of the entrepreneurial process and significantly impacts the business ecosystem and the economy. The study of the entrepreneurial process is incomplete without examining the exit phenomenon. In this research, we intend to achieve a more accurate understanding of this phenomenon by analyzing the entrepreneurial exit during the six stages of growth. Prioritizing the reasons for exit for the business and social entrepreneur will contribute to a more accurate understanding of this area.
Methodology: The research sample consisted of experts and entrepreneurs gathered through snowball sampling. We used repeated-measures methods to rank the reasons for exit reasons.
Findings: After reviewing the opinions of experts and entrepreneurs, it was found that the importance of exit reasons in both types of business and social entrepreneurs changes during the different stages of business growth. On the other hand, the reasons for exit from the entrepreneur's viewpoint are not necessarily related, so the importance of exit causes from the perspective of the individual and social entrepreneur is different. Still, they are identical from the perspective of business and social enterprise.
Originality/Value: This study uses the method of measuring duplicate measures to rank the reasons for the departure of Iranian entrepreneurs (at the commercial and social level) during different stages of business growth. The study indicates that the exit causes differ in various stages and cannot be included in the list for all businesses regardless of their growth stage.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneurs exit
  • Business growth stages
  • Social entrepreneur
  • Business entrepreneur
Abetti, P. A. (2001). Accelerated growth: helping companies get and stay on the fast track. International journal of manufacturing technology and management3(1-2), 15-30.
Aldrich, H. (1997). The entrepreneurial process: economic growth, men, women, and minorities. small business economics, 11, 395–398.
Autio, E., & Acs, Z. J. (2007). Individual and country-level determinants of growth aspiration in new ventures. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research27(19), 1-12.
Blake, R. R., Avis, W. E., & Mouton, J. S. (1966). Corporate darwinism houston. Gulf Publications
Cardon, M. S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matherne, B. P., & Davis, C. (2005). A tale of passion: new insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of business venturing20(1), 23-45.
Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of business venturing26(6), 604-623.
Cumming, D. (2008). Contracts and exits in venture capital finance. The review of financial studies21(5), 1947-1982.
Decker, C., & Mellewigt, T. (2007). Thirty years after Michael E. Porter: what do we know about business exit?. Academy of management perspectives21(2), 41-55.
DeTienne, D. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: theoretical development. Journal of business venturing25(2), 203-215.
DeTienne, D. R., & Wennberg, K. (2015). Research handbook of entrepreneurial exit. Edward Elgar Publishing.
DeTienne, D. R., & Wennberg, K. (2013). Small business exit: review of past research, theoretical considerations and suggestions for future research. Forthcoming chapter in" Small businesses in a global economy: creating and managing successful organizations"(edited by S. Newbert). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Greiner, L. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard business review, 50, 37–46.
Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: distinguishing between closure and failure. Small business economics21(1), 51-61.
Kazanjian, R. K. (1983). The organizational evolution of high technology ventures: the impact of stage of growth on the nature of structure and planning process (Doctoral dissertation, Wharton School of Business Administration). Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=7398543
Kimberly, J.R. & Miles, R.H. (1980). The organizational life cycle. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Kunkel, S. W. (2001). Toward a typology of entrepreneurial activities. Academy of entrepreneurship journal7(1), 75-90.
Lichtenstein, B. B., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: a complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. Leadership quarterly, 20, 617–630.
Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard business review61(3), 30-50.
Salter, M. S. (1968). Stages of corporate development: implications for management control (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University). Retrieved from https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/79146185/editions
Schary, M. A. (1991). The probability of exit. The RAND journal of economics, 22(3), 339-353.
Scott, M., & Bruce, R. (1987). Five stages of growth in small business. Long range planning20(3), 45-52.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review25(1), 217-226.
Stam, E., Thurik, R., & Van der Zwan, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets. Industrial and corporate change19(4), 1109-1139.
Strotmann, H. (2007). Entrepreneurial survival. Small business economics28(1), 87-104.
Tam, S., Lee, W. B., & Chung, W. W. (2001). Growth of a small manufacturing enterprise and critical factors for success. International journal of manufacturing technology and management3(4-5), 444-455.
Ucbasaran, D., Shepherd, D. A., Lockett, A., & Lyon, S. J. (2013). Life after business failure: the process and consequences of business failure for entrepreneurs. Journal of management39(1), 163-202.
Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D. R., & Cardon, M. S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of business venturing25(4), 361-375.
Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., Hellerstedt, K., & Nordqvist, M. (2011). Implications of intra‐family and external ownership transfer of family firms: short‐term and long‐term performance differences. Strategic entrepreneurship journal5(4), 352-372.
Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Binks, M. (2005). Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contributions. Small business economics25(2), 109-132.