نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مدیریت پروژه و ساخت، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

10.22105/imos.2021.303205.1165

چکیده

هدف: اگرچه در سال‌های اخیر مدل‌سازی اطلاعات ساختمان به‌عنوان فناوری نوظهور در صنعت ساخت‌وساز ایران، مورد توجه افراد زیادی قرار گرفته، اما بهره‌وری پایین این صنعت، شرایط تحقق بسیاری از منافع حاصل از پیاده‌سازی این فناوری را با موانع بسیاری مواجه کرده است. پیاده‌سازی چنین فناوری‌هایی در مقیاس ملی، سازمانی و فردی، منوط به پذیرش آن‌هاست که متأسفانه وضعیت پذیرش BIM در ایران، بنا بر تحقیقات پیشین در این زمینه، بسیار کند و نامطلوب است.
روش‌شناسی پژوهش: در تحقیق حاضر، از طریق توزیع پرسش‌نامه‌ای بین شرکت‌های ساختمانی رتبه یک استان تهران، وضعیت پذیرش BIM با استفاده از مدل پذیرش فناوری (TAM) به دست آمد.
یافته‌ها: تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها که با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد، نشان داد وضعیت پذیرش BIM در تمامی 87 نمونه معتبر تحقیق، کمتر از حد متوسط است. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان داد هرچقدر افراد در ذهن و باور خود، استفاده از BIM را آسان‌تر تصور کنند، بیشتر می‌پندارند که استفاده از BIM برایشان سودمند است و هر دو این متغیرها، میزان گرایش بیشتری به ‌سمت پذیرش فناوری BIM را منجر می‌شوند.
اصالت/ارزش افزوده علمی: شاید بتوان با تمرکز بر تقویت مؤلفه‌های فردی و رفتاری در راستای پذیرش بیشتر BIM، وضعیت پذیرش کند BIM را در صنعت ساختمان ایران بهبود بخشید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

BIM Adoption in Construction Companies of Tehran province, Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sahar Taheripour
  • Mojtaba Azizi
  • Ehsanallah Eshtehardian

Department of Construction and Project Management, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran;

چکیده [English]

Purpose: Although in recent years, Building Information Modeling as an emerging technology in the Iranian construction industry, has attracted the attention of many people, but the low productivity of this industry, the conditions for the realization of many benefits from the implementation of this technology has faced many obstacles. The implementation of such technologies on national, organizational and individual scales depends on their adoption. According to previous research in this field, unfortunately the adoption of BIM in Iran, is very slow and undesirable.
Methodology: In the present study, by distributing a questionnaire among the first ranked construction companies in Tehran province, the BIM adoption status was obtained using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).
Findings: The data analysis, which was performed using Structural Equation Modeling, showed BIM adoption was below average in all 87 valid samples. The research findings showed that if people to imagine using BIM in their minds and beliefs easier, the more they think that using BIM is usefulness, and both of these variables lead to a greater intention to adopt BIM technology.
Originality/Value: As a result, it may be possible to improve the BIM adoption status in the Iranian construction industry by focusing on strengthening individual and behavioral dimensions in order to further BIM adopting.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Adoption
  • Construction Companies
  • Technology acceptance model (TAM)
  • Building Information Modeling (BIM)
Ahmed, A. L., & Kassem, M. (2018). A unified BIM adoption taxonomy: conceptual development, empirical validation and application. Automation in construction96, 103-127.
Akour, I. (2006). Factors influencing faculty computer literacy and use in Jordan: a multivariate analysis. Louisiana Tech University.
Ayinla, K. O., & Adamu, Z. (2018). Bridging the digital divide gap in BIM technology adoption. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 25(10), 1398-1416.
Azhar, S., Nadeem, A., Mok, J. Y., & Leung, B. H. (2008, August). Building Information Modeling (BIM): a new paradigm for visual interactive modeling and simulation for construction projects. Proc., first international conference on construction in developing countries (Vol. 1, pp. 435-46). https://www.academia.edu/download/35698780/045.pdf
Barlish, K., & Sullivan, K. (2012). How to measure the benefits of BIM—a case study approach. Automation in construction24, 149-159.
Boddaghi, H., & Mousavi, S. M. (2016). The effects of using new construction methods on time, cost and quality parameters of construction projects from the perspective of project knowledge management system. 4th International congress on civil engineering, architecture and urban development, Tehran. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/618040/ 
Chen, K., Lu, W., Peng, Y., Rowlinson, S., & Huang, G. Q. (2015). Bridging BIM and building: From a literature review to an integrated conceptual framework. International journal of project management33(6), 1405-1416.
Dizon, G. (2016). Measuring Japanese EFL student perceptions of internet-based tests with the technology acceptance model. Tesl-Ej20(2), n2. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1113906
Dorani, K., & Rashidi, Z. (2007). A study of determinant factors in Information Technology Acceptance by teachers of smart schools in Tehran. Research in educational systems, 1(1), 23-46. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=83641
Ejei, J. (2012). The role of cognitive beliefs in relationship between individual and organizational factors with information. International journal of behavioral sciences6(1), 1-9.
Farah, T. E. (2005). Review of current estimating capabilities of the 3D Building Information Model software to support design for production/construction (Doctoral Dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/213000704.pdf
Gao, J., & Fischer, M. (2008). Framework and case studies comparing implementations and impacts of 3D/4D modeling across projects (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.4427&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the association for Information Systems1(8), 1-30.
Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2006, January). PLS, small sample size, and statistical power in MIS research. Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) (Vol. 8, pp. 202b-202b). IEEE.
Herr, C. M., & Fischer, T. (2019). BIM adoption across the Chinese AEC industries: an extended BIM adoption model. Journal of computational design and engineering6(2), 173-178.
Hosseini, B. (2015). Study of BIM implementation process in Iranian construction projects with the approach of examining barriers and limitations (Master Thesis, Elm Sanat University).
Hosseini, M. R., Azari, E., Tivendale, L., Banihashemi, S., & Chileshe, N. (2016). Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Iran: an exploratory study. Journal of engineering, project, and production management6(2), 78-89. (In Persian). https://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30088915
Kassem, M., & Succar, B. (2017). Macro BIM adoption: comparative market analysis. Automation in construction81, 286-299.
Khoshnava, S., Ahankoob, A., Preece, C., & Rostami, R. (2012, December). Application of BIM in construction safety. Management in Construction Research Association (MiCRA), postgraduate conference, university technology Malaysia, Malaysia.
Kim, Y. J., Chun, J. U., & Song, J. (2009). Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective. International journal of information management29(1), 67-77.
Koushki, M. (2017). Comprehensive evaluation of solutions, impedies, costs and effects of BIM implementation in Iran and the World. 1th National conference of building information modeling, Tehran. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/708868/
Kymmell, W. (2008). Building Information Modeling: planning and managing construction projects with 4D CAD and simulations (McGraw-Hill construction series). McGraw-Hill Education.
Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. JISTEM-journal of information systems and technology management14, 21-38.
Lee, S. K., & Yu, J. H. (2013). Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation factors on BIM acceptance. Journal of the Korea institute of building construction13(3), 242-252.
Li, P., Zheng, S., Si, H., & Xu, K. (2019). Critical challenges for BIM adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from China. Advances in civil engineering2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9482350
Lindblad, H., & Vass, S. (2015). BIM implementation and organisational change: a case study of a large Swedish public client. Procedia economics and finance21, 178-184.
Liu, Z. Y. (2015). An analysis of technology acceptance model-exploring user acceptance and intension of taxi-hailing app in Shanghai. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/38592
Mehran, D. (2016). Exploring the adoption of BIM in the UAE construction industry for AEC firms. Procedia engineering145, 1110-1118.
Motawa, I., & Carter, K. (2013). Sustainable BIM-based evaluation of buildings. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences74, 419-428.
Nemati, P., Eshtehardian, E., & Azizi, M. (2016). How to measure BIM organizational maturity (case study: Housing Investment Company). International conference of architecture and urban, Tehran. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/484390/
Ngowtanasawan, G. (2017). A causal model of BIM adoption in the Thai architectural and engineering design industry. Procedia engineering180, 793-803.
Park, J., Kim, B., Kim, C., & Kim, H. (2011). 3D/4D CAD applicability for life-cycle facility management. Journal of computing in civil engineering25(2), 129-138.
Porwal, A., & Hewage, K. N. (2013). Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects. Automation in construction31, 204-214.
Rouhani, N., & Banihashemi, Y. (2018). Categoring of BIM imolementation barriers with barrier type and decision-making level approach. 1th International conference of BIM, Tehran. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/804927/
Son, H., Lee, S., & Kim, C. (2015). What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? an empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects' behavioral intentions. Automation in construction49, 92-99.
Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: an Asian perspective. Computers in human behavior24(4), 1634-1642.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision sciences27(3), 451-481.
Winberg, A., & Dahlqvist, E. (2010). BIM-the next step in the construction of civil structures. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?dswid=259&pid=diva2%3A431673