Abbaszadeh Tavassoli, S., Avakh Darestani, S., & Abbaszadeh Tavassoli, M. (2017). Green supplier evaluation and selection using TOPSIS & DEMATEL (case study: Fulad Gilan company). Factualy of humantities, 12(39), 15-28. (In Persian). URL: http://imj.iausdj.ac.ir/article_536674.html
Amirteimoori, A., & Khoshandam, L. (2011). A data envelopment analysis approach to supply chain efficiency. Advances in decision sciences, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/608324
Amirteimoori, A., Kordrostami, S., & Sarparast, M. (2006). Modeling undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis. Applied mathematics and computation, 180(2), 444-452.
Azadi, M., Jafarian, M., Saen, R. F., & Mirhedayatian, S. M. (2015). A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers & operations research, 54, 274-285.
Azizi, H. (2011). The interval efficiency based on the optimistic and pessimistic points of view. Applied mathematical modelling, 35(5), 2384-2393.
Azizi, H. (2012). A new approach for supplier selection in the presence of imprecise data: DEA with double frontiers. Management research in Iran, 16(2), 129-150. (In Persian). URL: http://mri.modares.ac.ir/article-19-8553-fa.html
Azizi, H. (2012). Efficiency assessment in data envelopment analysis using efficient and inefficient frontiers. IQBQ, 16(3), 153-173. (In Persian). URL: http://mri.modares.ac.ir/article-19-118-fa.html
Azizi, H., & Ajirlu, H. G. (2011). Measurement of the worst practice of decision-making units in the presence of non-discretionary factors and imprecise data. Applied mathematical modelling, 35(9), 4149-4156.
Azizi, H., & Ajirlu, S. F. (2010). Measurement of overall performances of decision-making units using ideal and anti-ideal decision-making units. Computers & industrial engineering, 59(3), 411-418.
Azizi, H., & Jahed, R. (2015). Supplier selection in volume discount environments in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data: a new approach based on double frontiers DEA. IQBQ, 19
(3), 191-217. URL: http://mri.modares.ac.ir/article-19-6010-fa.html
Azizi, H., Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2016). A data envelopment analysis approach with efficient and inefficient frontiers for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data. Modern research in decision making, 1(2), 139-170. (In Persian). URL: http://journal.saim.ir/article_21122.html?lang=en
Barbarosoglu, G., & Yazgac, T. (1997). An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Production and inventory management journal, 38(1), 14-21.
Ben-Israel, A., & Robers, P. D. (1970). A decomposition method for interval linear programming. Management science, 16(5), 374-387.
Cecchini, L., Venanzi, S., Pierri, A., & Chiorri, M. (2018). Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO2 abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): a SBM-DEA model with undesirable output. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 895-907.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Chinneck, J. W., & Ramadan, K. (2000). Linear programming with interval coefficients. Journal of the operational research society, 51(2), 209-220.
F ̈re, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio economics planning science, 4(1), 35–49.
Fallahpour, A., Olugu, E. U., Musa, S. N., Wong, K. Y., & Noori, S. (2017). A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Computers & industrial engineering, 105, 391-410.
Fathi, A., & Saen, R. F. (2018). A novel bidirectional network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating sustainability of distributive supply chains of transport companies. Journal of cleaner production, 184, 696-708.
Fazeli Farsani, M., Ziglari, F., & Asadi, Sh. (2015). Scruting the performance of commodity suppliers and contractors, supply chain gas company province Charmahal and Bakhtiari by methodology DEA. Journal of strategic management research, 21(58), 101-116. (In Persian). URL: http://smr.journals.iau.ir/article_525539.html
Ghaemi Nasab, F., & Mamizadeh Chatghayeh, S. (2013). Supplier selection using a DEA-Topsis method. International journal of data envelopment analysis, 1(1), 33-42. (In Persian). URL: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=357182
Ghazanfari, M., & Riazi, A. (2003). Designing a hierarchical decision making procedure to evaluation: select and develop supplier in SCM. International journal of industrial engineering and production management (IJIE), 14(4), 211-227. (In Persian). URL: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=2898
Hladík, M. (2009). Optimal value range in interval linear programming. Fuzzy optimization and decision making, 8(3), 283-294.
Hladík, M. (2010). Generalized linear fractional programming under interval uncertainty. European journal of operational research, 205(1), 42-46.
Hladık, M. (2010). On necessarily efficient solutions in interval multi-objective linear programming. In proceedings of the 25th mini-EURO conference on uncertainty and robustness in planning and decision making (pp. 1-10).
Hladík, M. (2012). Complexity of necessary efficiency in interval linear programming and multi-objective linear programming. Optimization letters, 6(5), 893-899.
Hosseinzadeh, A. A., Alahviranloo, T., Hosseinzadeh Loti, F., & Vaez-Ghasemi, M. (2018). Solving fully interval linear programming problems. (In press).
Huang, G., & Dan Moore, R. (1993). Grey linear programming, its solving approach, and its application. International journal of systems science, 24(1), 159-172.
Ida, M. (1999). Necessary efficient test in interval multi-objective linear programming. In proceedings of the eighth international fuzzy systems association world congress (pp. 500-504).
Inuiguchi, M., & Sakawa, M. (1995). Minimax regret solution to linear programming problems with an interval objective function. European journal of operational research, 86(3), 526-536.
Izadikhah, M., & Saen, R. F. (2018). Assessing sustainability of supply chains by chance-constrained two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable factors. Computers & operations research, 100, 343-367.
Izadikhah, M., Tavana, M., Di Caprio, D., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2018). A novel two-stage DEA production model with freely distributed initial inputs and shared intermediate outputs. Expert systems with applications, 99, 213-230.
Jafarnezhad, A., & Esmaelian, M. (2008). Evaluation and selection of supplier in supply chain in case of single sourcing with fuzzy approach. Human sciences modares, 12(4), 127. (In Persian). URL: https://www.magiran.com/paper/711900
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Vencheh, A. H., Foroughi, A. A., & Matin, R. K. (2004). Inputs/outputs estimation in DEA when some factors are undesirable. Applied mathematics and computation, 156(1), 19-32.
Jauhar, S. K., & Pant, M. (2017). Integrating DEA with DE and MODE for sustainable supplier selection. Journal of computational science, 21, 299-306.
Javadnia, A., & Gholam-abri, A. (2013). Evaluating the production materials suppliers of Saipa industrial group by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Journal of industrial strategic management (pajouheshgar), 10(31), 43-52. (In Persian). URL: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=386169
Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics information management, 16(6), 382–394.
Khalilzade, M., & Katebi, M. (2015). Evaluation and selection of supply chain suppliers with a combined approach of ANP, QFD and fuzzy SIR. The second international conference on management in the 21st century, Tehran. URL:https://www.civilica.com/Paper-ICMNG02-ICMNG02_009.html
Khodakarami, M., Shabani, A., Saen, R. F., & Azadi, M. (2015). Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: an application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement, 70, 62-74.
Kordrostami, S., & Amirteimoori, A. (2005). Un-desirable factors in multi-component performance measurement. Applied mathematics and computation, 171(2), 721-729.
Korhonen, P. J., & Luptacik, M. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 154(2), 437-446.
Kumar, A., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega, 42(1), 109-123.
Lee, E. K., Ha, S., & Kim, S. K. (2001). Supplier selection and management system considering relationships in supply chain management. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 48(3), 307-318.
Liu, W., Zhou, Z., Ma, C., Liu, D., & Shen, W. (2015). Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Omega, 56, 74-87.
Lodwick, W. A., & Jamison, K. D. (2003). Special issue: interfaces between fuzzy set theory and interval analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 135(1), 1-3.
Maghbouli, M., Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2014). Two-stage network structures with undesirable outputs: A DEA based approach. Measurement, 48, 109-118.
Narasimhan, R. (1983). An analytical approach to supplier selection. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 19(4), 27–32.
Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., & Mendez, D. (2001). Supplier evaluation and rationalization via data envelopment analysis: an empirical examination. Journal of supply chain management, 37(2), 28-37.
Noorizadeh, A., Mahdiloo, M., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2013). Evaluating relative value of customers via data envelopment analysis. Journal of business & industrial marketing, 28(7), 577-588.
Nydick, R. L., & Hill, R. P. (1992). Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. International journal of purchasing and materials management, 28(2), 31-36.
Oliveira, C., & Antunes, C. H. (2007). Multiple objective linear programming models with interval coefficients–an illustrated overview. European journal of operational research, 181(3), 1434-1463.
Oliveira, C., & Antunes, C. H. (2009). An interactive method of tackling uncertainty in interval multiple objective linear programming. Journal of mathematical sciences, 161(6), 854-866.
Önüt, S., Gülsün, B., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Tuzkaya, G. (2008). A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems. Information sciences, 178(2), 485-500.
Rashidi, K., & Cullinane, K. (2019). A comparison of fuzzy DEA and fuzzy TOPSIS in sustainable supplier selection: implications for sourcing strategy. Expert systems with applications, 121, 266-281.
Rashidi, K., Shabani, A., & Saen, R. F. (2015). Using data envelopment analysis for estimating energy saving and undesirable output abatement: a case study in the organization for economic Co-operation and development (OECD) countries. Journal of cleaner production, 105, 241-252.
Razavyan, Sh., & Tohidi, M. (2010). DMUs with network structure and imprecise data. Journal of sciences (Islamic Azad university), 19(74/2), 53-60. (In Persian). URL: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=273408
Rommelfanger, H., Hanuscheck, R., & Wolf, J. (1989). Linear programming with fuzzy objectives. Fuzzy sets and systems, 29(1), 31-48.
Saen, R. F. (2010). A decision model for selecting appropriate suppliers. International journal of advanced operations management, 2(1-2), 46-56.
Saen, R. F. (2010). Developing a new data envelopment analysis methodology for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 51(9-12), 1243-1250.
Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., Madhoshi, M., & Jamalian, A. (2017). Explanation of affecting factors in sustainable suppliers' selection in Saipa Company. Iranian journal of supply chain management, 19(55), 32-48. (In Persian). URL: https://scmj.ihu.ac.ir/article_203617.html?lang=fa
Salehi, M., & Sayyah, M. (2017). Evaluation and selection of efficient suppliers in terms of uncertainty -the grey data envelopment analysis approach. Iranian journal of trade studies, 21(81), 181-203. (In Persian). URL: http://pajooheshnameh.itsr.ir/article_24527.html?lang=en
Sengupta, A., & Pal, T. K. (2000). On comparing interval numbers. European journal of operational research, 127(1), 28-43.
Sengupta, A., Pal, T. K., & Chakraborty, D. (2001). Interpretation of inequality constraints involving interval coefficients and a solution to interval linear programming. Fuzzy sets and systems, 119(1), 129-138.
Shabanpour, H., Yousefi, S., & Saen, R. F. (2017). Future planning for benchmarking and ranking sustainable suppliers using goal programming and robust double frontiers DEA. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 50, 129-143.
Shafiei Nikabadi, M., Yakideh, K., & Oveysi Omran, A. (2017). An integrated approach of DEA with a variety of outputs and windows analysis for evaluating efficiency of the power industry. Journal of industrial management perspective, 6(4), 157-180. (In Persian). URL: http://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87218.html?lang=en
Shahrodi, K., & Tadriss-hasani, M. (2011). A mathematical model to select suppliers through data envelopment analysis integrated and total cost of ownership approaches (case study: value chain in Iran automotive industry). Journal of operational research and its applications, 8(3), 71-81. (In Persian). URL: https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=164791
Shaocheng, T. (1994). Interval number and fuzzy number linear programming. Fuzzy sets and systems, 66(3), 301-306.
Shin, H., Collier, D. A., & Wilson, D. D. (2000). Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance. Journal of operations management, 18(3), 317-333.
Soyster, A. L. (1974). A duality theory for convex programming with set-inclusive constraints. Operations research, 22(4), 892-898.
Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2010). Should the US clean air act include CO2 emission control: examination by data envelopment analysis. Energy policy, 38(10), 5902-5911.
Thuente, D. J. (1980). Duality theory for generalized linear programs with computational methods. Operations research, 28(4), 1005-1011.